
The Wrong Man was a film released in 1956 where one could have high hopes since Alfred Hitchcock is the director, but it was a little too slow and plodding for my taste. Maxwell Anderson and Angus MacPhail are the screenwriters for this film which was apparently a true account of a man’s unjust arrest for a series of armed robberies. It is based on Anderson’s book entitled The True Story of Christopher Emmanuel Balestero.
Henry Fonda is in the lead role as the one they call Manny. Vera Miles plays his wife whose sanity begins to unravel as the story unfolds. Anthony Quayle, Harold J. Stone, and Esther Miniciotti are included in the cast.
Manny is a jazz club musician whose wife is needing some significant dental care. When he goes to borrow some money from his wife’s insurance policy, he is identified by the women working there as a man who had held them up twice before. The police start to question him and find that other various shopkeepers victimized by the thief seem to believe him to be the culprit. The investigation leads to Manny’s arrest and trial. In the meantime, his wife has sunk into an alarming depression that requires her to be committed. Manny has his plate full when he has to cope with his wife’s mental distress on top of his legal troubles.
I found this film to not be one of Hitchcock’s best, but it’s still not deserving of being ignored. Henry Fonda’s performance is quite compelling, and I still managed to find some sympathy for his plight. Miles is also a nice casting decision as well. Her mental collapse is quite convincing without feeling too over the top.
I think Hitchcock spent a little time on the process of Manny’s arrest. I suspect he was trying to ratchet up the tension, but it felt more like padding at times.
This is the only film that is apparently based on a true story, and Hitchcock reportedly did not deviate too much from what actually happened.
The film does have a bit of a Hitchcock feel even if it is quite different from most of his best-known works. I still consider him to be deserving of the reverence he receives in the realm of filmmaking, but this particular work does not quite showcase that talent as well I would like.
The film seems to bring about some mixed reactions from various professional critics and agree with much of the negative feedback, but I would still recommend seeing this one because the performances do make some of the problems less significant. It’s still a Hitchcock film, and this film is still a long way from being a dumopster fire.








