“Out of the Darkness” is a trilogy of three Doctor Who audio readings featuring Colin Baker as the Sixth Doctor and Nicola Bryant as Peri.  I think this release was first published about twenty years ago as part of BBC Radio Collection.  I think a couple of the stories were first published in the “Short Trips” volumes several years ago.

The first story is “Moon Graffiti” by Dave Stone in which both Baker and Bryant share the narration.  The Doctor and Peri are caught in a struggle between humans in the far future and aliens known as the parachnids.  I remember Stone’s earlier contributions in the novel ranges and found him to have some of stranger offerings in the series, which is saying something for Doctor Who.  Baker and Bryant are both well practiced narrators and performers, but there was not much to make this all that memorable to me.

“Wish You Were Here” by Guy Clapperton was presented by Baker all on his own.  The Doctor looks in the disappearance of an old friend where he encounters an alien holiday camp and a strange robot Redcoat.  Once again, it is Baker’s somewhat bombastic delivery that helps me stay somewhat interested, however only somewhat.

“Vigil” by Michael Collier completes this little anthology and this time is read by Nicola Bryant all on her own.  The Doctor and Peri arrive in Hastings and find that a serial killer may be on the loose, or it could be something else more troubling.  This is probably the best of the three entries, but once again nothing to write home about.

This is fine for fans such as myself who just had never heard it before, but I am not sure there is much to really miss here.  There is nothing really horrible about it, and Colin Baker and Nicola Bryant are compelling readers and performers as they usually are on audio, but nothing really popped for me in the actual stories.

“Annabelle Comes Home” is the latest film in the franchise what has become known as the Conjuring Universe.  Gary Dauberman came up with the screenplay and directed the film which sees the return of Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga as Ed and Lorraine Warren, the adorable paranormal investigators and exorcists.  James Wan returns as producer and a co-story developer or something.  As far as the cast goes, we get to introduced to young Judy Warren, played by McKenna Grace.  Madison Iseman joins in the terror as the babysitter who gets too close of a look at the artifacts of the Warrens’ ghostly pursuits.  Katie Sarife is a lesser known actress who plays the babysitter’s best friends who unwittingly releases the unholy gifts of the demonic doll Annabelle.

There was some potential to make the main characters somewhat cliché here, however the female protagonists were quite likeable.  Even the somewhat naughty best friend was not beyond redemption.  McKenna Grace was a solid casting choice for her role as the Warrens’ daughter.  She is pretty but also has an appropriately unusual look that helped to sell her performance.  Of course, I am sure there is little that is unusual about the Grace’s features in real life, but she seemed a good fit for this type of film.

Iseman was also quite good as the compassionate, at times heroic babysitter.  It was a good choice to give Sarife a back story that was a bit heartbreaking.  Her character of Daniela had a little deeper motivation than her reckless demeanor would suggest.

These kind of movies typically portray teen-agers as quite shallow and somewhat deserving of their gruesome fates.  This film manages to avoid these clichés, which I found rather refreshing.  Yes, there are some of the goofy decisions made which is typical of these kind of films, but I didn’t hate any of the main characters and was rooting for them to outfox the malevolent Annabelle.

The elder Warrens are largely absent in this film, and I found myself missing them a bit, however the three girls at the center of the supernatural maelstrom are interesting enough for me to not get too distracted by that.

There were some pretty effective scares once the spirits are unleashed from the locked room where the Warrens’ keep their souvenirs.  The movie isn’t without its predictability though.

Look, this isn’t the greatest of all horror movies, but I think it works well enough for the most part.  I have mentioned before that it is nice to see a married couple who are united in their goals and willing to support and indeed save each other from the spooks and ghouls they encounter.  It’s an unusual genre to find such support for the idea of committed marriage in a Hollywood production, but I like the Warrens and hope there are some more films to come with them, and I think McKenna Grace could join in as well.

Now these movies are based on an actual couple who apparently looked into these kind of cases.  I am sure there are plenty of Hollywood liberties taken in the depiction of Ed and Lorraine, but I don’t have any complaints.

It’s a pretty good time for those of use who have a twisted enjoyment of the macabre. Until next time, Annabelle….

“The Kiss” is a 1929 film with an interesting history.  It is one of the last of the silent films released by MGM and was also the final one to feature Greta Garbo before her transition into the “talkers”.  Jacques Feyder is the director of this piece which was written by Hanns Kraly.  Conrad Nagel, Lew Ayres, and Anders Randolf are included in the cast as well.

Garbo plays a young woman in an unhappy marriage who is having an affair with a successful lawyer.  When a much younger man also has his eye on the admittedly lovely Irene, the husband walks in and ends up dead.  The police do not believe her claims that her husband killed himself and charge her with murder. Remember when I mentioned that her lover was an attorney?  Yeah, he gets the unenviable task of representing her in court.

The plot falls a bit on the cheesy side,  but the performances were pretty good.  Garbo certainly had the looks where it was believable that she was worth all of this angst and controversy.  The historical significance of this film makes it a bit more fascinating as well.  I would not recommend watching this lying on the couch after a busy weekend since the music can be rather hypnotic, and one doesn’t have the benefit of raised voices suddenly breaking in to grab the wandering mind.

It’s a film that works quite well for the era it was released and has a pretty fascinating legacy for the real film historians.

“The Masters of Luxor” is a Doctor Who audio play released a few years ago by Big Finish Productions as part of the Lost Stories range.  Nigel Robinson adapted a script that was originally conceived by Anthony Coburn.  This story has an interesting history in that it was supposed to have been the second television serial if another more intriguing adventures known as “The Daleks” had not have been broadcast instead.  William Russell and Carole Ann Ford reprise their roles as Ian Chesterton and Susan, respectively, as well as share narration duties.  Joseph Kloska joins them as a guest actor portraying several characters, but most notably as the not so aptly named The Perfect One.

The Doctor and his companions are drawn to a seemingly dead world by a mysterious signal and find a vast dormant army of robots. Then, a creation of theirs known as the Perfect One reveals himself and has some plans to make himself more human which does not bode well for the TARDIS crew.

This adventure has six parts, and I am not sure this story needed to be that long. It seemed to move at a slow crawl at times.  Ford and Russell are both effective storytellers so that helped a little.  Russell, of course, has to stand in for the late William Hartnell as the First Doctor and does his best.  He’s pretty impressive anyway for doing these performances when he is closing on a century of life.

The sound effects and musical score were effectively realized, but Big Finish almost always comes through with the technical requirements.

It’s a worthy addition for Doctor Who fans who appreciate the very early years, but it just seems longer than necessary.

“Child’s Play” gets updated in a new film directed by Lars Klevberg.  Tyler Burton Smith is the credited screenwriter.  The film stars Aubrey Plaza, Gabriel Bateman, and Tim Matheson.  Mark Hamill is cast to voice the malevolent doll known as Chucky.

This time, Chucky gets his mean streak from a disgruntled company man who removes the safety protocols from the artificial intelligence in the shape of a Buddi doll.  He befriends a young boy with a hearing impairment. The boy is being raised by a single mother who works in a store where the Buddi dolls are being sold.

The murders are outlandishly gruesome with copious amounts of blood splatter.  The whole movie if outlandish and rather stupid, but still oddly enjoyable.  There is a strange dark humor throughout which helps keep one engaged.  Hamill is actually quite good, however that is not surprising.  He has etched out quite a career since “Star Wars” as a voice actor.  He has a long run as the Joker in the animated Batman films that have been released over the past couple of decades.  Brad Dourif provided the voice in the original series of “Child’s Play” films and did a fine job, but I think Hamill’s portrayal gives him a run for his money.

The main child character played by Bateman develops a group of friends which sort of made me think of “The Goonies”.  I liked the two main friends known as Falyn and Pugg, played by Beatrice Kitsos and Ty Consiglio, respectively.

The film is quite stupid on so many levels but still manages to be enjoyable on other levels.  Maybe I was just in the right frame of mind to see this thing.  Anyway, as far as mindless and macabre entertainment goes, it could have gone worse.

“Why Kill the Innocent” is a recent installment into the series featuring Sebastian St. Cyr, Viscount Devlin, which has been written by C.S. Harris for some time now.  The series takes place in early nineteenth century England where a young aristocrat and former intelligence officer has a talent for murder investigation.  He is married to a woman whose father is never far from royal scandal.  Sebastian has found out several haunting secrets of his own family background in this series.

The basic plot is that Sebastian’s wife and a friend come across a corpse half buried in the snow in the winter of 1814.  The dead woman is identified as Jane Ambrose, a piano teacher for one of the princesses, who has had a troubled marriage and not nearly the recognition she deserves for her talents as a composer and musician.  Apparently, that particular winter in England was quite fierce, although Sebastian gets around quite easily as his curiosity is once again aroused enough for him to look into this matter. Of course, more murder is afoot as his investigation progresses.

I may have read too many of this series.  It was fine, but nothing that kept me on the edge of my seat.  There was quite a bit of lamenting of how unfairly women were treated in that era, which sometimes was distracting from the main story.  It is kind of cool to see that Sebastian actually is a devoted husband and father in spite of the contention that had been present when he and his wife first encountered each other.  The mental chess game continued between Sebastian and his powerful, sly father-in-law who often turns up as a suspect whenever royalty is involved.  It’s still an engaging idea for a series in a fascinating era of British history, however I am not sure this particular entry is all that captivating.

Time to explore a more recent author who delves into more complicated family dynamics herself.  Next up is “My Sister, the Serial Killer” by Oyinkan Braithwaite.

“Abducted” is a thriller novel written by T.R. Ragan and introduces a traumatized private investigator named Lizzie Gardner.  When she was a child, Lizzie was kidnapped and held captive by a serial killer who liked to terrify his unwilling guests with venomous spiders.  She ended up calling him Spiderman.  Anyway, Lizzie escaped his clutches and grew up to be a tightly wound private eye with a lost love who turns back up in her life. It was thought that Spiderman was identified and imprisoned, however girls started disappearing again and notes are left taunting Lizzie.

There is not much here I have not seen in other detective series.  Lizzie is mildly interesting but a little too familiar.  This Spiderman character is a bit cartoonish. His motivation for his misdeeds lack a bit of creativity.  He believes he is purging society of troublesome teen-age girls or something.  Of course, he is playing cruel mind games with our intrepid, dogged Lizzie.

The prose style is competent but not all that compelling.  It was good enough to keep me interested to see how this whole played out, but I am an easy audience for this genre.  It ended up being a serviceable distraction but not much more.

“Murder Mystery” is a comedy, and well….a mystery film that stars Adam Sandler and Jennifer Aniston.  James Vanderbilt is the writer of this latest effort to spoof my favorite genre while Kyle Newacheck is the reasonably competent director.  Luke Evans, Gemma Arterton, and Terence Stamp are included in the cast.

A married couple take a somewhat impromptu trip to Europe to fulfill a promise that was made on their wedding date fifteen years before.  Sandler plays Nick Spitz, a New York City cop who has some trouble getting promoted to detective while Aniston has the role of the hairdresser wife with a perfectly understandable love for murder mysteries. Adam Sandler basically does the kind of obnoxious, clueless character he usually performs.  Spitz is one of these guys with no verbal filter who keeps making promises which he cannot quite deliver on.  His wife, Audrey, is the likeable, ditzy sort who wants a bit more romance from her husband.  I am not sure what she expected from marrying someone by the name of Nick Spitz and is as slovenly as most of Sandler’s roles.  If one doesn’t examine the motivations too closely and rest them against…you know… reality, the pairing does rather work for this film.  It’s probably because both of the lead stars have such profound record of comedic acting.  This doesn’t seem too much of a stretch for either of them, but Aniston in particular was often quite good.  I think she would be considered the straight man in this particular double act.  She and Sandler do seem to have pretty believable chemistry for the most part, especially since she has mastered the art of exasperation.  Sandler was Sandler.  I had some trouble getting to like his character for quite a while.

The film itself was fine.  There was nothing all that new under this particular sun.  The plot dealt with lots of rich Europeans, a disputed inheritance, and familial betrayals.  There was some location shots, and a pretty good car chase scene.

Not all of the jokes landed that well, but not all of them missed the mark either.  Two practiced comedy veterans like Aniston and Sandler do help keep this movie from being a train wreck, but the writing and that sense of this being more of the same does keep it from being that memorable.

There is still some fun to be had with this film in spite of the cracks.

 

“Men In Black: International” is the latest in the “Men In Black” film franchise in case anyone couldn’t figure that out by the title.  Yes, it continues the series which previously starred Will Smith and Tommy Lee Jones.  This time, we get two new agents portrayed by the hunky Chris Hemsworth and the undeniably gorgeous Tessa Thompson.  Thompson, of course, being the one who kept my attention the most, for the obvious and politically incorrect reasons.  Although as well as being quite eye-catching, Thompson puts in an unsurprisingly good performance.  I am not surprised that she kept up well enough with the talents of other more seasoned actors such as Emma Thompson and Liam Neeson because I have seen quite a bit of her other work and can’t recall anything where she was disappointing.  She has already established engaging chemistry with Hemsworth from their time together in recent MCU films. A couple of fellows named Art Carcum and Matt Holloway are the scriptwriters with F. Gary Gray directing this latest cinematic venture.

The film starts off with a young girl witnessing the intervention of a couple of MIB agents when they are tracking a cute little alien that has managed to elude them.  The girl sees the employment of the famous neuralyzers which erases the memories of her parent’s encounter with the mysterious MIB.  She grows up to be some kind of genius who is able to find the headquarters and is recruited by Emma Thompson’s characters.  There are two actors named Thompson in this one, so this could get a little tricky.  Anyway, the newly minted Agent M is sent to London where she meets Liam Neeson’s High T and Hemsworth’s Agent H, and the two new partners have to go on the run, find some other alien weapon, and then a mole in the agency.  Typical MIB hijinks.

This film is pretty easy to mock in many ways, but it does work better than I expected for another installment in a probably overdone franchise.  Hemsworth and Tessa Thompson do work well together.  Even the ridiculous tiny alien sidekick known as Pawnee, voiced by Kumail Nanjiani, was not as annoying as he could have been. I actually ended up liking the little guy, and those kind of characters usually are rather obnoxious.

Rebecca Ferguson plays the lead villain here as an arms dealer who has well…three arms.  She apparently is a former flame of the hapless Agent H.  She’s fine in this role. There’s a pretty good fight scene between her and Agent M.

There were some nods to the prior films, but not too much, which I sort of appreciated. I don’t mind a tip of the hat to what came before, but that sort of practice could get a little distracting if one is trying to introduce new characters and elements into a long-running franchise.

There are times when the writing and editing falls short on coherence, but the charisma and performance of the cast is helpful in making that somewhat forgivable.  It’s not entirely forgivable, but I didn’t leave the theater in a rage over a misspent afternoon. Some of the supposed twists and surprises were not all that hard to predict.  I was pretty entertained, particularly in the second half.  If the head honchos here decide to reunite Agent H and Agent M, I might still be willing to give them another go, hoping for a better plot, of course.

“The Final Problem/ The Empty House” is an audio double feature from Big Finish Productions featuring Sherlock Holmes starring Nicholas Briggs and Richard Earl as the crime solving duo of 221B Baker Street. Briggs has been quite busy in this one.  He directed this release with the assistance of Ken Bentley as well as adapting the material written by the master himself, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.  This is a pivotal point in the original canon when Doyle tried to kill off his most famous literary creation and then brought him back to the pages of “The Strand” a few years later.

This has a pretty small cast that features Alan Cox as the malevolent Professor Moriarty alongside John Banks and Beth Chalmers.  This is pretty much an audio book since Earl reads the narration as Dr. Watson almost word for word.

Nicholas Briggs gives a solid performance as Holmes.  I am not sure why I have a bit of a hard time fully buying into his interpretation though.  Sometimes he doesn’t sound quite as natural as I would prefer when reading some of the dialogue.  He is a fellow Sherlockian so I don’t have the heart to be all that critical of his performance.  Actually, I am getting used to his delivery, so I am not really that put off by him.  I also do not find him to be bad in the role, but I may be too used to some of the prior thespians such as Basil and Jeremy.  It may just be the way the prose is written in that it tempts him to sound a little more haughty than he needs to, although Holmes really isn’t the most humble of souls. Anyway, I actually have a tremendous respect for Briggs’ talents as a writer and producer, and he does well enough as an actor in other episodes.  I enjoy his enthusiasm for Sherlock Holmes and the other ranges he works on for Big Finish.  I am glad that Big Finish contribute to the Holmes legacy, and Briggs should continue to be a major part of that.

Richard Earl is the perfect choice for Watson.  I found the way he pitched his voice when relating Watson’s reaction to Holmes’ sudden reappearance in his consulting room after being thought dead after the battle with Moriarty at Reichenbach Falls in Switzerland very enthralling.  I have read these stories numerous times and watched the televised version starring Jeremy Brett as well, and it’s a great moment in all adaptations I have seen or heard.  Earl probably has the hardest performance since he is the one speaking through most of the episodes, and he really is quite engaging.

John Banks plays the role of Colonel Sebastian Moran in “The Empty House”.  He is a solid performer as well, but he delivers the hatred with gusto.  He borders a bit on overacting during his brief moments, but Doyle’s style of writing can lend itself to such an approach at times.

I was pleased with how faithful this presentation was to the original stories published by Sir Arthur.  The sound effects were quite convincing as well.  The theme music also serves quite nicely in building the anticipation for the adventure to begin in earnest.

This is probably one of the strongest releases in this range, and it is largely due to the respect demonstrated to Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s original presentation of these two stories.  It’s very enjoyable regardless of the how much I have read or experienced these two stories in the past.