“The Last Detective” by Peter Lovesey  in the first in a series to feature Detective Superintendent Peter Diamond and was first published in 1991.  Diamond is described the old-fashioned sort of gumshoe who still relies on “question and answer, doorstopping and deduction”.  Diamond still prefers to trust his instincts about people over science and lab results.  He basically has trouble changing with the times.  I think this sort of depiction of detective work is a bit of a misnomer.  Detectives of today still do a lot of door knocking and interviewing.  I think depicting Diamond as come kind of a dinosaur is just a bit overblown.

In spite of some mild exasperation at a somewhat questionable impression Lovesey conveys about the progress in police investigations, I did still enjoy this novel.  Diamond was a little gruff at times, which is fine, because I like a good curmudgeon in my protagonists. He also is a dogged and noble pursuer of the truth in spite of what it may cost him.  This case costs him quite a bit.  It will be interesting to see what personal and career choices come about in future installments.

A dead woman is found in a lake near Bath, somewhere in England.  Forgive my lapse in geographical insight.  Diamond learns the victim was an actress recently forced out of  the soap opera in which she starred.  Her husband is an English professor who may or may not be having  an affair.  At the center of this debacle are a couple missing letters purported to be written by one Jane Austen.

This is not exactly a new technique,  but Lovesey will change into first person perspectives through quite a bit of the story here.  I am not always a big fan of that sort of shift,  but I didn’t mind it so much this time. Lovesey handles it pretty well.

Much of the elements seem rather standard for a British murder mystery, however there are some startling and compelling twists and turns.  Superintendent Diamond is in for quite the ride, and this is only the first book in a rather lengthy series.

This is a series and character that should be looked up by fellow mystery readers.  I certainly intend to try out a few more Lovesey works.

I will stay with the detective genre in my next little selection.  In fact, this next one is quite a staple of mystery series. Nero Wolfe takes on three puzzlers with Rex Stout’s “Three Doors To Death”

“Arachnids in the UK” is the fourth Doctor Who episode with Jodie Whittaker in the lead role.  The Doctor and her companions return to present day England just after their encounter with the Stenza and the death of Graham’s wife and Ryan’s grandmother. The audience get to meet Yasmin’s family. Chris Noth guest stars as some kind of caricature knock off of Donald Trump  and other American business tycoons.

The threat is that spiders have gotten larger than normal and behaving much more lethally.  The Doctor learns of an experiment going out of control and a new luxury hotel being at the center of the chaos.

Head writer Chris Chibnall continues his streak of mediocre storytelling, however this particular episode just about tips over into utter dreck. There has been a lot of disdain over what is perceived as sacrificing the story for political correctness or social justice causes, and I have to say that this episode justifies those perceptions.  It covers the gambit from corporate greed to the dangers of pollution in its efforts to beat the audience over the head with the litany of humanity’s failings.

Basically, it got too preachy and was not that fun. The Doctor’s occasional ramblings were more annoying than fun.  Jodie Whittaker just doesn’t quite sell it to me.  I am trying to give her a fair opportunity for her version of the Doctor to appeal to me, but so far it has yet to work out.

Even when the story kind of centers on Yaz, Mandip Gill still feels superfluous in the cast. Even the usual chemistry and charm of Bradley Walsh and Tosin Cole was not much help.  Walsh does well with his convincing display of Graham’s grief over the recent death of his wife.

This isn’t the first time the show has delved into the evils of pollution or other social issues, but the past efforts were still entertaining due to the message being a bit more subtle.  Jon Pertwee’s era used to go in this directions a bit, but the stories were better written.

Chibnall just keeps falling short so far.  He wasted the talent and credentials of  an American actor like Noth with a character almost too boorish to be believable.  It was way too obvious that Donald Trump was the template for this character.  There was no effort to make him unique or interesting.

I have made no secret of my skepticism over the decision to change the Doctor’s gender, and this episode did nothing to reassure me that this was going to work out.  This episode is just inexcusably bad writing in which the need to preach social justice talking points outweighs what should just be the goal of entertainment and escape from reality for just a little while.

Hopefully next week’s episode will be a bit more reassuring for long-time fans such as myself.

 

 

 

“Doctor Who and the Monster of Peladon” is a novelization of the 1974 serial in which Jon Pertwee starred as the Doctor.  Terrance Dicks is the author of this entry into the Target novelizations of Doctor Who. This particular piece was published in 1980.

I picked this up largely to stoke some chord of nostalgia and it fills a hole in my collection of Doctor Who Target novelizations.  Dicks was a pretty simplistic writer.  He is well-known and often celebrated among Doctor Who fandom for that.  He was also prolific and instrumental in bringing Doctor Who to another medium.

The television story itself was rather average in spite of my affection for the Third Doctor.  It was an attempt at otherworldly political intrigue that fell flat and seemed more self-indulgent.  It is a sequel to another serial called “The Curse of Peladon”, which I enjoyed much more.

The Doctor and Sarah Jane Smith arrive fifty years after his first visit and find some plot to steal minerals.  A young queen is on the throne and is just beginning to find her footing with new responsibilities.  The Ice Warriors, or Martians, if one is inclined to be more PC, have returned to cause problems. I thought that was a rather unfortunate decision to make the Ice Warriors villains again since they were wary allies of the Doctor in the first Peladon story.

Anyway, this novel goes quickly, as typical of a Dicks contribution, however the enjoyment  received was more from revisiting a piece of childhood than anything else.

Time to return to something a bit more adult in my next literary diversion with an author who has been around for quite some time.  This time I am going to make the acquaintance of Detective Superintendent Peter Diamond in “The Last Detective”  by Peter Lovesey.  Seems appropriate, doesn’t it?

 

“Ready Player One” is a dystopian science fiction novel by Ernest Cline and was first published in 2011.  Wade Williams is a teen-ager who is trying to make it through a worldwide epidemic of poverty, overpopulation, and all of the crises that the Chicken Littles had been shrieking about. It is set in 2040’s, however many relics of pop culture from decades past still linger.

The denizens have the OASIS in which to escape, an extremely engrossing and complex virtual reality simulation that houses millions of people looking to retreat from their depressing, desperate reality.  The creator of the OASIS has died and left a quest for the those known as gunters, people who live for the ongoing game.  A prize awaits that could change of the world if the right person can claim it.

It’s an interesting novel in a lot of ways.  It’s one I would recommend for fellow readers to try, but there is a lot of 80’s pop culture references poured with abandon throughout the tale.  Cline, at times, can take a bit too much time in exposition which sometimes slows the action down.

Wade Williams is just as good as any other protagonist, I suppose.  He did seem to be a bit too unbelievably wily at times for me to buy into him being around 17 or 18 years old.  Some of the side plots were not a major surprise such as the expected romance that blossoms with another competitor.  Wade is soon smitten by someone whose real presence he has yet to experience.  I didn’t find anything too unique or engaging about dear Wade other than his seemingly impossible reservoir of knowledge of 80’s pop culture.

Although he does pull off a pretty impressive heist on the real world corporation that seeks to take control of the OASIS for more treacherous reasons.  Once again, it was a little hard to buy into a teen-ager being quite that slick.

It’s a fun novel for the most part. Even the aspects I found to be somewhat exasperating were not unforgivable.  I still would call this book better than the movie, although the movie wasn’t that bad either.

The next brief stop on the eternal literary journey will be an indulgence with a series that I enjoyed as a youngster. The novelization of the Doctor Who serial “The Monster of Peladon” by Terrance Dicks is the lucky winner.

“The Many Deaths of Jo Grant” is a Doctor Who audio drama from Big Finish Productions and is an episode of the range known as The Companion Chronicles.  Cavan Scott and Mark Wright co-wrote the script which stars Katy Manning returning as Jo Grant. Nicholas Asbury provides the back-up performance as Rowe.  Rowe is a strangely versatile character since Jo is living through several predicaments that apparently result in her demise, often sacrificing herself for the Doctor. In all of these occurrences, Rowe is there in various guises so it’s easy to figure out he’s up to something.

This episode really showcases Manning’s skill at voice work and narration. It is impossible for Manning to sound exactly like the late Jon Pertwee, or rather the Third Doctor, however she delivers his dialogue in a manner that easily brings him to the mind of the listener.  Her performance when speaking for the Doctor really reflects the affection she had expressed over the years for Pertwee.  Manning is getting up there in age, however her vocal skills have yet to show any diminishing, at least in this particular release.  This one did come out in 2011, but I still enjoying her even in the newer releases.

This episode really highlights how much Jo Grant was willing to sacrifice for the Doctor’s life and cause.  It also managed to convey how much the Doctor cared for her as well.  The chemistry and affection was very evident during this era of the television series in the 1970’s, and it seems it was effectively recreated even without the presence of Jon Pertwee.

I found this one to be rather more enjoyable than I expected.  It did seem to capture the spirit of the Third Doctor’s era while effectively showing the relationship and loyalty between the Time Lord and Jo Grant in a manner that feels somehow fresher. The resolution of the story also ends up being a bit of a surprise as well.

I would recommend this particular release to not be overlooked.

“Rosa” is the third episode in the eleventh series of the revived Doctor Who and is written by Chris Chibnall and Malorie Blackman.  Jodie Whittaker is still playing the Thirteenth Doctor and manages to have a feel interesting moments. I really still see what seems to be somewhat imitative of  some her recent predecessors in the role.  I have read some criticism of her acting that I think is a little unfair. Whittaker still isn’t my first choice for a Doctor nor have I bought into the notion that changing the Doctor’s gender was the necessity that was presented by Chris Chibnall and other producers of the show, but I don’t really find her acting to be that bad.

This episode has the Doctor and her friends meeting Rosa Parks in Alabama 1955 the day before her bold decision to not give up her seat on a bus.  It’s Doctor Who, so of course some extraterrestrial presence is trying to alter history enough to derail the Civil Rights movement.

I was a bit disappointed that the villain was some racist from the future who had been released from prison and still just didn’t black people.  I would have preferred a much more interesting motive behind his shenanigans.  I did like that he had some limitations imposed where he could not just kill Rosa Parks which would have been more straight forward method of accomplishing his task.  This character known as Krasko, played by Joshua Bowman, figured he could cause a derailment of established history by making subtle changes to the circumstances surrounding Rosa’s infamous arrest.  I thought that was a rather creative direction to take other than having some brute blundering around intent on just blowing away his obstacles.  Even the Doctor had to acknowledge Krasko’s cleverness for the subtleness of his schemes.

Another interesting result of my viewing of this episode is that I took a look at Rosa Parks’ Wikipedia page and noticed that she ended up being involved in other significant aspects of the Civil Rights Movement.  She apparently was very active in the movement even before her unfortunate encounter with bus driver, James Blake. Vinette Robinson was the actress who took on the role in this story, and there is not much to say other than she did a good job.  It was kind of amusing to watch her not knowing what to make of the Doctor’s very unusually diverse crew. By that, I mean I am sure there were not many parties of four wandering around 1950’s Alabama with a young black man, a woman of Pakistani descent, and an older man with British accents taking direction from an attractive blonde in a peculiar ensemble of clothing.

There were parts I thought were a little cliché in its dealing with this unfortunate aspect of American history, and I think there were some missed opportunities to make this episode a bit more interesting.  Saying that, it did pique my interest to read a more accurate account of Rosa Parks’ part in that history, and she is considerably more impressive than merely having a stubborn moment of defiance on a bus.  I found it interesting that a British television institution like Doctor Who would pay such a tribute to a woman whose impact is far more significant to American culture.

The new Doctor still seems to be finding her way, and the writers are still struggling with to utilize three companions effectively.  I am surprised how fond I am becoming of Bradley Walsh’s character, Graham O’Brien.  I like the conflicting relationship he has with Ryan Sinclair, played by Tosin Cole.  Ryan is the grandson of Graham’s recently deceased wife.  I hope there is a more consistent affection that develops between the two characters.  Yasmin Khan, played by Mandip Gill, is pretty and generally likeable, but there just still doesn’t seem to be enough for her to do in the story.  I hope the writers start to figure out how to make her more relevant if she stays in the show as it progresses this year.

Anyway, the episode is a bit more interesting than I expected, but I think there were potential directions in the story that were overlooked that could have made it even more compelling.

 

 

 

 

“Goosebumps 2: Haunted Halloween” is a family friendly horror comedy based on the series of novels by R.L. Stine.  Rob Lieber and Darren Lemke came up with the idea for this fairly entertaining cinematic escapade which was directed by Ari Sandel.

A couple of young boys who collect junk as a bit of a start-up business find a dusty old book in a dilapidated abandoned house which brings them into the presence of a mischievous ventriloquist’s doll named Slappy. Slappy possesses a taste for bad puns and some wicked telekinesis.  The older sister of one of the junk collectors gets pulled into the chaos when Slappy’s misbehavior starts to go full throttle.

The visual effects were pretty convincing and occasionally had moments of real creativity.  Since this movie is aimed at kids and families, the scares were kept at a minimal.

The young actors at the center of this piece were pretty charming and seemed to work well together.  There were some scenes such as a weird battle with Gummy Bears that could have been better executed or really left out.  There were some genuinely amusing zingers bandied about at times though.  Not all of the dialogue landed well, however enough of it did for me to be reasonably entertained by the performances.

The character of R.L. Stine is not ignored either, however I think his involvement in this film is not as significant as the first one.  Jack Black was fine if a little hammy.  But he’s almost always hammy.  Of course, it’s a comedy for kids, so hammy acting is kind of par for the course here. Anyway, I actually think that I have yet to see the first one, so I am curious enough to watch out for it.

The script isn’t great obviously, but the movie ended up being reasonably fun.

 

“The Children of Seth” is a Doctor Who audio play from Big Finish Productions and is one of the Lost Stories range.  Marc Platt adapted this script which was originally conceived by Christopher Bailey in the 1980’s.  Peter Davison returns as the Fifth Doctor alongside Janet Fielding and Sarah Sutton.

The Doctor, Nyssa, and Tegan answer a summons to a world that is about to go to war with a mysterious enemy known as Seth.  It’s one of those stories that contain some pretty complex political machinations.  I had some trouble following this one.  I think the concepts were once again a little too hard to picture in the mind’s eye.  I likely need to listen again and concentrate a bit more, but there is likely a problem with the editing and presentation if this cannot grab a listener on the outset.

There are some fine performers in this one with Honor Blackman and David Warner being the most notable.  The regular cast interacts well.

I don’t think this release is just outright terrible, but it is relatively a weaker one in my opinion.  It may just take another listen or two to appreciate more strengths in this particular episode.

“Halloween” is the sequel to a little 1978 film called “Halloween”. The writers and producers made the bold decision to ignore the sequels that have been produced in the past decades.  David Gordon Green is the director who also co-wrote the script alongside Danny McBride and Jeff Fradley.  Prolific horror movie makers, Blumhouse Productions, is the studio backing this version.

Jamie Lee Curtis reprises her role as Laurie Strode, the sole survivor of Michael’s first killing spree, who is now a somewhat agoraphobic and paranoid grandmother, itching for the chance to finally kill Michael should he escape his long incarceration.  Laurie is estranged from her daughter, however she seems to have maintained a somewhat stable relationship with her teenaged granddaughter.  Will Patton plays the cop who helps with the hunt for Michael Myers after he makes his predictable escape.

Most of this movie actually works pretty well.  There is some of the silliness of clichéd goofy teenaged behavior that often bedevils this genre.  Not all of Michael’s victims were all that sympathetic or interesting.

There was a pretty interesting plot twist involving the psychiatrist who took over for the late Dr. Loomis, who was played by the late Donald Pleasance.

This is a Michael Myers that has been stripped back down to the basics.  He is just a killing machine with new real reason behind it. There is also no explanation for his obsession with Laurie Strode, but that’s okay.  It does seem implausible that he remains as lethally resourceful as ever in spite of being behind bars for four decades, but even that is understandable.  Who wants to see Michael Myers flounder around with indecision and confusion just because of an enforced 40 year sabbatical?

Jamie Lee Curtis also does well conveying the conflicting emotions of being frightened of Michael Myers and determined to finally finish him.  It was fun to see her actually go hunting for her nemesis.  She made Laurie a pretty complicated and compelling character, however I do not really recall her in a role that misfired.

Ultimately, this film had a lot of good decisions made from its creators and performers. It’s not perfect, or that close to it, but it should well enough for the fans of this franchise or this genre.

 

“Dark Passage” is a film released in 1947 and stars Humphrey Bogart, Lauren Bacall, and Agnes Moorehead.  It was directed by Delmer Daves after it was adapted from a novel by David Goodis,.

A man convicted of the murder of his wife escapes from San Quentin and finds himself in the company of an art student who has some sympathy for his plight, believing him to be innocent of the crime.  Bogart’s character, Vincent Parry, find out about a plastic surgeon known to do some side work.  With a new yet older appearance, Parry tries to escape the city, but his efforts keep getting interrupted.

The story seems to rely on quite a bit of coincidence that is a little hard to swallow easily. Bogart is just too cool to really hold much against this movie.  The story itself was pretty interesting, and the performances were engaging for the most part.

There was nothing to really hate about this film, but there were some aspects that could have been a little better thought out.  It’s one of those films where seeing Bogart and Bacall together again tends to compel me to forgive much of the flaws.  It’s still worth checking out because it’s Bogey and Bacall.